Market Definition/Description
Sales force automation platforms are tools that natively support (not via third-party add-ons and solutions) automation and capture of sales activities, processes and administrative responsibilities for organizations’ sales professionals. They also support initiation, engagement and capture of buyer-seller interactions through multiexperience and channel-agnostic approaches and devices, and dissemination of actionable insights to improve sales contact management, pipeline management, opportunity management, guided selling and forecasting process execution. The optimal desired experience for sales users (leadership, managers and sellers) are not limited to internal use cases, and can be scaled to support buyer-seller intermediation and shared experiences with prospects and customers.
Sales force automation (SFA) is a foundational sales technology, implemented to automate and augment an organization’s core sales processes while also improving the seller’s ability to engage via customer interaction touchpoints and devices.
The standard capabilities of SFA systems include:
Lead, account, contact and opportunity management
Sales activity management
Collaboration
Guided selling
Pipeline and forecast management
Mobile, IoT device(s), bot capabilities
Visualizations and analytics
Partner relationship management capabilities
Platform, integration and composability
Proposal and quote builder (not formal configure, price and quote [CPQ])
Optional capabilities include:
Magic Quadrant
Figure 1: Magic Quadrant for Sales Force Automation Platforms
Vendors Added and Dropped
We review and adjust our inclusion criteria for Magic Quadrants as markets change. As a result of these adjustments, the mix of vendors in any Magic Quadrant may change over time. A vendor's appearance in a Magic Quadrant one year and not the next does not necessarily indicate that we have changed our opinion of that vendor. It may be a reflection of a change in the market and, therefore, changed evaluation criteria, or of a change of focus by that vendor.
Added
No vendors were added to this Magic Quadrant.
Dropped
Zendesk was dropped from this Magic Quadrant because it did not meet the criteria for inclusion.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
For Gartner clients, Magic Quadrant research identifies and then analyzes the most-relevant providers and their products in a market. By default, Gartner uses an upper limit of 20 vendors to support the identification of the most-relevant providers in a market. Occasionally, Gartner may extend the upper limit, in situations where the intended research value to our clients might otherwise be diminished. The inclusion criteria represent the specific attributes that analysts believe are necessary for inclusion in this research.
Level 1
To qualify for inclusion in the 2023 Magic Quadrant for Sales Force Automation Platforms, vendors were required to meet eight of the following nine criteria:
Account/Contact Management, Activity Management, Opportunity Management: Serve as a system of record for account and contact management; sales activity management; and opportunity management. Vendor should also be able to natively support systems of engagement for capturing and facilitating sales and customer interactions, tasks and activities.
Pipeline Management: Serve as a system of record for sales and support sales-customer engagement journeys through channel-agnostic interactions, including web portal (self-service), SMS, chat, and email at minimum. Vendor should also support predictive and/or prescriptive analytics for pipeline management. (Must include all three.)
Forecast Management: Serve as a system of record and system of insights for capturing, auditing and recording forecasting processes, and be able to demonstrate the ability to automate the forecasting process.
Lead Management: Serve as a system of record for lead management capabilities, which includes functions for lead nurturing, lead conversion tracking and lead attribution analysis.
Guided Selling: Provide guided selling capabilities in the form of formal sales playbooks and rule-based recommendations that align with sales playbooks.
Provide a platform for extending sales processes with custom user interfaces, custom data objects, custom data fields and custom workflows, including (but not limited to) building engagement support with a diverse set of channel interactions.
Provide a platform for extending sales processes into customer interaction channels for buyer-seller engagement support in at least four core channels, namely, web portal (self-service), SMS, chat and email.
Provide native, open APIs that allow the solution to integrate with third-party applications, such as (but not limited to) ERP systems, BI tools, unified communication tools or other applications that may be deemed relevant to a selling organization.
Provide mobile and device capabilities, whereby sellers and their managers can manage their primary daily sales from either a natively-provided mobile application, mobile web browser or IoT device. Sellers and managers must also be supported by a low-code mobile application development SDK (for mobile apps). Native applications should work without the internet or offline.
Level 2
Vendors that met these Level 1 criteria were then required to meet both of the following criteria to qualify:
Have customers with live SFA implementations in at least two of the three use cases for Sales Force Automation Platform critical capabilities: B2B sales, B2C sales and indirect/relationship sales.
Make at least two major CRM SFA releases with significant functional improvements during the 12 months from 1 March 2022 to 16 March 2023. A new or acquired offering from an established provider in this market is also considered, if Gartner established that offering was being sold to customers.
Level 3
If vendors met Level 2 criteria, they were then required to meet at least four of the following five criteria:
Provide native PRM capabilities. To qualify for this criterion, providers must offer a portal-user license type, offer portal management capabilities for partners to manage leads and opportunities assigned to them, and offer partner life cycle management capabilities. All three criteria must be satisfied to qualify for this category of evaluation.
At least 50 customers with live SFA platform implementations as of 1 February 2022, spanning at least four industries, in accordance with industry definitions established by Gartner, listed in the Evaluation Criteria section below.
Must have an average number of SFA paid users (neither partner users nor freemium users) per customer (not org/instance) of at least 25 users as of 1 February 2022.
Revenue from SFA platform sales of at least $14 million during the calendar year 2022.
During the 12 months from 1 February 2022 to 16 March 2023, closed SFA contracts with at least 18 new logos (not new contracts sold to an existing client) on deals that exceed $750,000 in total contract value. Alternatively, vendors may have closed SFA contracts with at least 50 new logos on deals from $50,000 to $750,000 in total contract value.
Evaluation Criteria
Ability to Execute
In terms of capabilities, sales organizations require different levels of depth and complexity. Vendors that support a wide range of complexity have greater market potential, and are positioned accordingly. Because this is a cross-industry Magic Quadrant, evaluation of a provider’s offering is focused on the ability to serve several broad industry sectors, not to provide industry-specific solutions.
Product or Service: This criterion looks at core goods and services that compete in and/or serve the defined market. Vendors are evaluated on the quality of their native SFA capabilities, including both the core capabilities and SFA extensions. Vendors are also evaluated on technical considerations, such as ease of use and administrative functions. Gartner assesses information provided from the Gartner Peer Insights data, as well as other, publicly available sources, from the Critical Capabilities research and from observations collected from Gartner inquiries.
Overall Viability: This is an assessment of the organization’s overall financial health, as well as the financial and practical success of the business unit. We consider the likelihood of the organization continuing to offer and invest in the product, as well as the product position in the current portfolio.
Vendors will be evaluated on additional factors, such as customer retention rate, and their ability to generate revenue specifically in the SFA market.
Sales Execution/Pricing: This includes an organization’s capabilities in all presales activities and the structure that supports them. It considers deal management, pricing and negotiation, presales support and the overall effectiveness of the sales channel. The vendor must provide global sales and distribution coverage that aligns with its marketing messages. It must have specific experience and success selling SFA applications to sales buying centers (i.e., the VP of sales or sales operations) and to application leaders. Among the many factors in this category, Gartner evaluates the number of new customers acquired, growth in SFA revenue, average SFA deal size, average contract duration and customer retention. Gartner also evaluates clients’ satisfaction with contracting and negotiation processes.
Market Responsiveness and Track Record: This criterion considers a vendor’s ability to respond, change direction, be flexible and achieve competitive success as opportunities develop, competitors act, customer needs evolve and market dynamics change. We also consider the vendor’s history of responsiveness to changing market demands. Gartner evaluates the quality and depth of the vendor’s releases, and the ability to release functions requested by clients.
Marketing Execution: The clarity, quality, creativity and efficacy of programs designed to deliver the organization’s message to influence the market, promote the brand, increase awareness of products and establish a positive identification in the minds of customers. This “mind share” can be driven by a combination of publicity, promotional, thought leadership, social media, referrals and sales activities.
Gartner will measure the frequency and quality of the vendor’s marketing techniques, including its use of publicity promotions, and thought leadership in social channels or print publications. Gartner will also evaluate the vendor’s presence on the shortlists of Gartner’s clients and the scope of available third-party solutions.
Customer Experience: This criterion considers products and services and/or programs that enable customers to achieve anticipated results with the products evaluated — specifically, quality supplier/buyer interactions, technical support or account support. This may also include ancillary tools, customer support programs, availability of user groups and service-level agreements (SLAs). Feedback from active customers on generally available releases during the past 12 to 18 months is an important consideration. Sources of feedback include Gartner client inquiries and other customer-facing interactions, such as Gartner conferences, Peer Insights and research surveys. Customer experiences are evaluated based on the vendor’s ability to help customers achieve positive business value, as well as sustained user adoption, quality implementation and ongoing support.
Operations: The ability of the organization to meet goals and commitments.
Table 1: Ability to Execute Evaluation Criteria
Enlarge Table
Evaluation Criteria | Weighting |
---|
Product or Service | High |
Overall Viability | Medium |
Sales Execution/Pricing | High |
Market Responsiveness/Record | High |
Marketing Execution | Low |
Customer Experience | High |
Operations | Medium |
|
Source: Gartner (March 2023)
Completeness of Vision
Gartner evaluates vendors on their ability to convincingly articulate logical statements. This includes current and future market direction, innovation, customer needs and competitive forces, as well as how well these statements map to Gartner’s view of the market.
Market Understanding: This includes the ability to understand customer needs and translate them into products and services. Vendors that show a clear vision for their market listen, understand customer demands, and can shape or enhance market changes with this. Vendors must define how their SFA solutions improve clients’ sales process execution and support sales effectiveness objectives. Vendors must also define their competitive differentiators, value proposition and the outcomes achieved by their clients. Vendors are also evaluated on their articulated and demonstrated ability to align with clients’ customer experience, digital business and sales execution optimization objectives.
Marketing Strategy: In this category, we look for clear, differentiated messaging that is consistently communicated internally and externalized through social media, advertising, partner programs, systems integrators (SIs), customer programs and positioning statements. Vendors are evaluated on their segmentation strategies and how their solutions appeal to selling organizations in multiple verticals, as well as prospects with 50 or more sales sellers. If the vendor derives a significant percentage of its revenue from recurring revenue-based products, it must also have a customer retention strategy.
Sales Strategy: In this category, we look primarily for a sound selling strategy that uses the appropriate direct/indirect sales strategy, as well as partners that extend the scope and depth of market reach, expertise, technologies, services and customer base. Vendors are evaluated on their ability to sell to both business and IT stakeholders, as well as to the segments defined in the marketing strategy.
Offering (Product) Strategy: This category includes the vendor’s approach to product development and delivery that emphasizes market differentiation, functionality, methodology and features, as they map to current and future requirements. Gartner assesses the vendor’s product and packaging offerings. The vendor should not only demonstrate a product vision that accounts for core SFA functionality (as defined by the market’s core capabilities), but also one that offers new application functionality across the breadth and depth of product capabilities. The latter consideration is critical for meeting the needs of a maturing market.
Subcapabilities include the vendor’s vision for:
Sales enablement capabilities, such as content management, sales training and coaching
B2B and B2C digital commerce
Digital sales rooms
Sales effectiveness capabilities (e.g., CPQ or order management)
Integration with third-party sales applications, although primary focus is on native capabilities
Business Model: In this category, we look for how the design, logic and execution of the organization’s business proposition helps it achieve continued success. Vendors need to have clear business plans for how they will be successful in the SFA market. These business plans should include appropriate levels of investment to achieve profitability and healthy revenue growth during a three- to five-year period. Sales channels and partnership strategies are important components.
Vertical/Industry Strategy: In this category, we look for how the vendor deploys products to meet the specific needs of individual market segments, including verticals. Vendors will be evaluated on the scope of native-built applications that automate industry-specific sales processes in verticals such as financial services and life sciences. Vendors will also be evaluated on the scope of third-party partnerships with ISVs that offer industry-specific capabilities.
Innovation: This concerns direct, related, complementary and synergistic layouts of resources, expertise or capital for investment, consolidation, defensive or preemptive purposes. Vendors are evaluated on the quality of their enhancements and product releases. Vendors must show continued investment in improving core SFA capabilities. They must also show growth in new areas such as improving sales execution, analytics, collaboration or new devices such as IoT; or new technology directions, such as digital business and bot-building capabilities to support multiexperience.
Geographic Strategy: We look at the vendor’s strategy to direct resources, skills and offerings to meet the specific needs of geographies outside the “home” or native geography. This can be direct or through partners, channels and subsidiaries, as appropriate for that geography and market. Vendors will be evaluated on the percentage of employees allocated to the regions, as well as the depth and scope of partners available in those regions.
Table 2: Completeness of Vision Evaluation Criteria
Enlarge Table
Evaluation Criteria | Weighting |
---|
Market Understanding | High |
Marketing Strategy | Medium |
Sales Strategy | Medium |
Offering (Product) Strategy | High |
Business Model | Low |
Vertical/Industry Strategy | Medium |
Innovation | High |
Geographic Strategy | Medium |
|
Source: Gartner (March 2023)
Quadrant Descriptions
Leaders
Leaders have the ability to execute their vision through products, services and demonstrably solid business results, in the form of revenue and earnings. Leaders have significant successful worldwide customer deployments in a wide variety of industries, and with multiple proof points for deployments above 500 users. They demonstrate consistently above-average CX levels, product execution scores and sales execution scores.
They demonstrate product leadership, delivering new enhancements and innovations on a consistent schedule. They also provide thought leadership, showing customers and prospects how their SFA solutions improve sales execution and sales processes.
Challengers
Challengers are often larger than most (but not all) Niche Players, and demonstrate a higher volume of new business for SFA. They have the size to compete worldwide; however, in some cases, they may not be able to execute equally well in all geographies or segments. They often return stronger CX satisfaction scores. They understand the evolving needs of a sales organization, yet may not lead customers into new functional areas with a strong functional vision.
Challengers tend to have a good technology vision for architecture and other IT organizational considerations, but have not won over the top sales executives and/or application leaders in the IT organization.
Visionaries
Visionaries are ahead of most potential competitors in delivering innovative products and/or delivery models. They anticipate emerging and changing sales needs, and move the market into fresh areas with solutions that improve sales execution.
Visionaries have strong potential to influence the direction of the SFA market, but are limited in terms of execution and/or track record.
Niche Players
Niche Players offer products for SFA functionality, but may lack some functional components. Some may not show the ability to consistently handle deployments of more than 500 users across multiple geographies. Some may lack strong business execution in the SFA market, even if they have strong critical capabilities. These vendors may offer complete portfolios for a specific industry, but face challenges in one or more areas necessary to support cross-industry requirements, such as complex forecasting and pricing and quotation features. They may have an inconsistent implementation track record, or they may lack the ability to support the requirements of large enterprises.
Niche Players often offer the best solutions for the needs of particular sales organizations or sales use cases.
Context
Given that there are more than 75 SFA vendors worldwide, the vendors in this research are a small part of the overall SFA vendor market. Hundreds more vendors provide basic contact management software, which is a subset of SFA. Dozens of vendors have built vertical-specific SFA solutions.
Because it is not possible to review every SFA provider, this Magic Quadrant evaluates SFA solutions that are broadly applicable to many differently sized sales organizations and verticals.
We place particular emphasis on vendors’ core SFA capabilities, as described in the Market Definition/Description section of this Magic Quadrant. However, for the purpose of building as complete a picture as possible, we also evaluate their noncore SFA capabilities, such as sales engagement and sales enablement functionality.
SFA means different things to different types of sales organizations:
Product-driven, transactional sales organizations, such as those with short-cycle B2B sales, value its basic lead and opportunity management capabilities to reduce sales cycles and improve sales management visibility.
Product and service organizations selling enterprisewide deals, such as long-cycle B2B sales organizations, value account management and forecasting capabilities. These organizations often also value lead management, CPQ and sales content management systems. They often tie together proposals, bids, configurations and quotes with authorizations and order capture systems. Organizations operating in this space require granular forecasting and pipeline management features.
Organizations engaged in relationship selling require SFA tools to manage their customer and prospect data, but also require sales enablement tools for content distribution and sales activity capture.
Organizations that sell via indirect sales channels require PRM capabilities.
Sales Organization Sizing
In this Magic Quadrant, Gartner refers to sales organization customer sizes or vendor target segments. We define these segments as follows:
Small business — fewer than 100 sales users
Midsize enterprise (MSE) or business — 101 to 1,000 sales users
Large business — 1,001 to 2,500 sales users
Enterprise-size — more than 2,500 sales users
Market Overview
The SFA market grew 14.4% to an estimated $10.7 billion in 2022. Gartner continues to facilitate a large number of inquiries surrounding vendors and their capabilities. Most notably, these inquiries involve clients revisiting their SFA investments/deployments to assess alternatives in the market, or out of the need to support a unified CX strategy and digital transformation efforts within organizations.
Gartner clients are questioning the value of their SFA investments and deployments, which are often symptoms of SFA solutions never being aligned to sales business objectives and measured appropriately, data quality challenges, poor governance structures, and usability implementations. These lead to poor user adoption. Moreover, an increasing number of clients were also seeking best practices for implementation, which suggests SFA vendors may not be adequately supporting clients in maximizing the value of their contracted relationship. This could also suggest that the client may not have adequate resources and the skill set to manage the implementation. The third trend is one of understanding AI sales use cases, and improving data intelligence and insight gathering for improved lead and pipeline visibility and forecast predictability.
Gartner inquiries show clients:
Question SFA investment value — attributed to misalignment of sales business objectives with poor data quality and governance.
Found poor usability in implementations, leading to poor adoption.
Seek implementation best practices, resulting from inadequate resources for deployment support and subpar skill sets.
Lack an understanding of AI sales use cases to improve data intelligence and insight for improved lead and pipeline visibility, as well as greater forecast predictability.
The Rise of Generative AI Will Lead to New Sales Use Cases, Improve Usability and Increase Value Attainment
This could lead to an opportunity for technologies like generative AI to address the challenges of usability, data quality and enrichment, and an improved understanding of practical sales AI use cases. For example, generative AI promises to support improved data collection, intelligence gathering and synthesizing, process automation, and planning, which leads to improved usability supported by conversational interfaces. (See Multidimensional CRM: How GenAI Will Revolutionize Sales Force Automation Platforms.) Gartner expects SFA vendors to significantly reprioritize their roadmaps to focus on generative AI capabilities. This ability to absolve some of the challenges plaguing sales organizations for the last decade and beyond will make for a compelling value proposition. For example, to help with data quality challenges, generative AI solutions will be able to detect and rectify data inconsistencies, streamlining the data cleansing processes. They may even go so far as to retrieve missing data and fill in the gaps. This is largely dependent on the way the SFA system is integrated with dependent source systems, so that it is able to make data retrieval calls. Similarly, prompt engineering control shaped by vendors will also determine how users interact with SFA platforms, and which process automation capabilities will be permitted.
Further SFA implementation support will come in the way of generative AI bridging the gap with low-code, no-code approaches using prompt-based integration, workflow and business logic execution. This will help improve the time to value with SFA platforms, while minimizing the time and resources spent on configuration and development work. Gartner expects these aforementioned innovations to be the most significant value drivers. Clients often inquire about obtaining the single view of the customer, but often encounter shortcomings due to the inability to appropriately integrate a diverse set of tools and systems. These developments are likely to happen in the midterm, within approximately two to three years of generative AI maturation. Generative AI will be able to help either through anomaly detection, data conformance, or by flagging inconsistencies for further review while making suggestions in the process.
Functionality Trends
Advanced AI: All vendors in this Magic Quadrant have started to, or will have, generative AI infused into SFA key capabilities. Most notable use cases are occurring in the activity management capability, such as using AI to generate meeting and call summaries, and email responses, or to extract conversation insights. The second-most-impacted capability is guided selling, with vendors promising contextual content creation, meeting preparation and personalized real-time guidance. Lastly, investments are being made into natural-language processing and predictive capabilities to strengthen existing features, such as conversation intelligence and predictive forecasting models, but also introducing novel use cases, such as churn prediction and configurable AI/ML models.
User Interface and Experience: Most of the vendors in the Magic Quadrant are making UI improvements or complete overhauls to improve usability and efficiency. These changes include configurable UI designers, redesigned Kanban views, and new layouts for accounts and contacts. Most notable changes leading to this Magic Quadrant are within Oracle Sales and Creatio’s Freedom UI.
Automation and Workflows: Many SFA platform vendors are improving or adding additional workflow improvements. Much of this is geared toward introducing or improving sales development representative use cases by introducing sales engagement features, such as sales cadences or sequences. Further automation features are being introduced within guided selling features, such as through the introduction of guided lead management process steps and support for dynamic sales processes.
Evaluation Criteria Definitions
Ability to Execute
Product/Service: Core goods and services offered by the vendor for the defined market. This includes current product/service capabilities, quality, feature sets, skills and so on, whether offered natively or through OEM agreements/partnerships as defined in the market definition and detailed in the subcriteria.
Overall Viability: Viability includes an assessment of the overall organization's financial health, the financial and practical success of the business unit, and the likelihood that the individual business unit will continue investing in the product, will continue offering the product and will advance the state of the art within the organization's portfolio of products.
Sales Execution/Pricing: The vendor's capabilities in all presales activities and the structure that supports them. This includes deal management, pricing and negotiation, presales support, and the overall effectiveness of the sales channel.
Market Responsiveness/Record: Ability to respond, change direction, be flexible and achieve competitive success as opportunities develop, competitors act, customer needs evolve and market dynamics change. This criterion also considers the vendor's history of responsiveness.
Marketing Execution: The clarity, quality, creativity and efficacy of programs designed to deliver the organization's message to influence the market, promote the brand and business, increase awareness of the products, and establish a positive identification with the product/brand and organization in the minds of buyers. This "mind share" can be driven by a combination of publicity, promotional initiatives, thought leadership, word of mouth and sales activities.
Customer Experience: Relationships, products and services/programs that enable clients to be successful with the products evaluated. Specifically, this includes the ways customers receive technical support or account support. This can also include ancillary tools, customer support programs (and the quality thereof), availability of user groups, service-level agreements and so on.
Operations: The ability of the organization to meet its goals and commitments. Factors include the quality of the organizational structure, including skills, experiences, programs, systems and other vehicles that enable the organization to operate effectively and efficiently on an ongoing basis.
Completeness of Vision
Market Understanding: Ability of the vendor to understand buyers' wants and needs and to translate those into products and services. Vendors that show the highest degree of vision listen to and understand buyers' wants and needs, and can shape or enhance those with their added vision.
Marketing Strategy: A clear, differentiated set of messages consistently communicated throughout the organization and externalized through the website, advertising, customer programs and positioning statements.
Sales Strategy: The strategy for selling products that uses the appropriate network of direct and indirect sales, marketing, service, and communication affiliates that extend the scope and depth of market reach, skills, expertise, technologies, services and the customer base.
Offering (Product) Strategy: The vendor's approach to product development and delivery that emphasizes differentiation, functionality, methodology and feature sets as they map to current and future requirements.
Business Model: The soundness and logic of the vendor's underlying business proposition.
Vertical/Industry Strategy: The vendor's strategy to direct resources, skills and offerings to meet the specific needs of individual market segments, including vertical markets.
Innovation: Direct, related, complementary and synergistic layouts of resources, expertise or capital for investment, consolidation, defensive or pre-emptive purposes.
Geographic Strategy: The vendor's strategy to direct resources, skills and offerings to meet the specific needs of geographies outside the "home" or native geography, either directly or through partners, channels and subsidiaries as appropriate for that geography and market.